Blog

Questions clients always ask us – part two of two

April 2, 2019

The second part in our series of answers to questions that we are frequently asked by clients. If you missed it, here’s the first part.

 

Do we need all this history or these extra facts?

Generally speaking, the more information, the better. If you’ve got a well-written release then the more you can give to a journalist the better. It helps to create a story with more depth and can focus the reader in on more salient facts, which means that they are more likely to want to get to the reasons behind the story – namely your brand. After all who isn’t fascinated by this…

 

What’s a robust sample? Is that enough people?

We find that anything around between 1,500 and 2,000 general respondents is solid and will be accepted by the media as a meaningful reflection of the population. When it comes to more specific panels – eg, mothers of primary school aged kids, or people who work in offices, we reduce the respondent rate as it’s a harder to target demographic. That said we will still ensure those smaller populations are reflected in the most robust way, that could mean reducing the respondent rate to 150 (taxi drivers) or 1,000 (working parents) for example.

 

How long will the results take to come back?

We can usually turn things around within days, sometimes it takes a little longer depending on the specifics of the panel, but it’s always within a working week.

 

What feedback have you got from the news desks?

Most of the time, newsdesks are very busy and don’t have a lot of time to tell us their opinions and we don’t really want to keep pestering them for obvious reasons. However we will catch the odd shout, exclamation or grumble here and there, which we will pass on.

 

Can we go out with this again for the Sundays?

Yes, unless – and this is a big unless – it has made in the week. There’s nothing more that editors hate than being served up a story which someone else has run a few days earlier. While the Sundays are definitely a target – and one that PRs can often overlook, we need to be sure that we don’t pester the editors with stuff they’re not going to want to run.

Other posts

CALLING ALL PRS! FIVE TIPS FOR DEVELOPING A KICK-ASS CONSUMER RESEARCH PROJECT

March 27, 2019

We all know, in PR, just how rapidly the media landscape has changed over the past few years. Factors such as time poor journalists, the rise of social media fuelling news stories, and an upsurge in citizen journalism, all mean it is harder than ever to place PR stories in the traditional media. Yet consumer research is still seen by many in the industry as a failsafe way to get cut through in national news media – no matter how busy it is.

Read more

Six reasons why journalists hate PRs

March 7, 2019

The relationship between the journalist and the PR is a complex one, formed of both need and resentment in equal parts. There are some brilliant PRs out there. Competent, knowledgeable and quick to respond, they are the ones getting their clients in the papers every day. But there are others. And if there is something journalists love to do it is gossip, about nightmare experiences with those on “the dark side”.

Read more